Tom seems to be on the other side of the divide, and while i dont agree with him, i have to give him credit for being candid about the costs of his preferred policy). "Isaac Asimov on Throne" by rowena morrill via wikimedia commons. Where do ideas come from? The question has always had the potential to plague anyone trying to do anything worthwhile at any time in human history. But Isaac Asimov, the massively prolific and even more massively influential writer homework of science fiction and science fact, had an answer. He even, in one 1959 essay, laid out a method, though we, the general public, haven't had the chance to read it until now. . Mit technology review has just published his essay on creativity in full, while providing a few contextualizing remarks from the author's friend Arthur Obermayer, a scientist who invited Asimov on board an "out of the box" missile-defense research project at an mit spinoff called Allied Research.
There are two problems with this. First, anonymous speech is an important right protected by the first Amendment, and we should be concerned about laws that make it dramatically more difficult for people to exercise this right. Second, this kind of crack-down wont actually work. The Internet is just too big to pro-actively keep criminals off. People with a strong interest in avoiding getting caught will still find untraceable ways to access the Internet (such as tunneling through an offshore proxy server while law-abiding users will find it a much bigger hassle to check their email. What I find most striking about Toms post is that advocates of copyright maximalism are becoming increasingly candid about the tensions between their vision of copyright law reviews and traditional civil liberties like privacy and due process of law. Patrick is right that the war on file sharing is like the war on drugs: theres just no way to stop it without shredding our civil liberties in the process. Personally, i think our civil liberties are more important, and ive suggested changes to copyright law that would return it to its traditional focus on commercial activity.
London-Sire suggests that bu has made its campus network into a de-facto safe harbor for anyone using the Internet to commit any crime. It would seem that terrorists, pedophiles, phishing-scheme operators, hackers, identity thieves, and copyright pirates who can access the Internet through BUs network now have a get-out-of-jail-free carda judicial decision holding that any identifying data provided by bu is too hopelessly unreliable to support so much. Whats amazing about this argument is that it proves way, way too much: it applies to any network provider that allows customers to communicate without identifying themselves first. So, for example, the panera down the street from me offers anonymous, free wifi access. Terrorists, pedophiles, phishing-scheme operators, hackers, identity thieves, and copyright pirates can walk into panera, commit a variety of crimes, and walk out, and in all likelihood Panera wont be able to provide the police with any useful information about the culprit. (Panera might have logs showing the users mac address, but these are not easy to match to an individual, and they can be spoofed anyway). The same argument can be made about thousands of coffee shops, hotels, public libraries, and the millions of people with open wifi networks. If were going to hold isps liable for the actions of their anonymous users, the practical result will be dramatically fewer isps willing to take that risk. Say goodbye to anonymous wireless access in all of those places, because businesses just cant take the risk of being held liable for child pornography.
The Study of Administration teaching American History
The word limit is 2500 words. Such a short essay compared to my geo ee of 4000 words, and I could have went on past 4000 words on. but then my ee was on too broad of a topic, which probably wasnt a good thing. I guess thats why i could have went on and. Tok presentation next week. No idea what. Have to write iguana a script soon.
Its becoming increasingly clear to me that vigorous prosecution of the war on file sharing will lead to some deeply illiberal results. And our good friends at the Progress and Freedom foundations Center for Digital Property periodically write things that confirm the point. Former pffer Patrick ross, for example, has compared the war on file sharing to Americas lax approach to drug law enforcement. And last year Jim delong made the argument that stopping file sharing will require write copyright laws so draconian that they will make todays laws, including the dmca and lawsuits against 12-year-olds, look ridiculously permissive. Pffs new copyright guru, tom Sydnor, seems to be equally enthusiastic about using ever-more-draconian legal penalties and restrictions on civil liberties in order to back up his vision of copyright. His latest target is online anonymity, as he argues that Boston University is guilty of incompetence for allowing anonymous communications on its network: For those seeking to enforce federal laws or rights other than copyrights, this order is all bad news.
Thus, his speaker begs his lover to let us be true to one another! We learn that the narrator is speaking directly to his lover. His tone returns to a sense of calm as he presents the idea that they must comfort and remain faithful to the idea that they must remain faithful to one another because their relationship is all that they have. In these last nine lines, the land, which he thought was so beautiful and new, is actually nothing neither joy, nor love, nor light. We are here though as on a darkling plain, swept with confused alarms of struggle and flight, where ignorant armies clash at night.
In reality, arnold is expressing that nothing is certain, because where there is light there is dark and where there is happiness there is sadness(Riede). Wednesday february 15th: tok essay: Done! (Not that much work needed to be done on it, but it just feels good to have finished something else towards my ib diploma :P). Next up: geography field study! The data we got from our study was weird but the upside to that is well have lots to write for the sources of Error and evaluation of Technique. Well I guess thats what we get when we rely on everyone in the class gathering data, and consequently have to assume the data is correct.
Five steps to Writing a good For and Against Essay blog
The sea of faith writing was once, too, at the full, and round earths shore. The key word in that stanza is essay once, because it implies that the narrator used to look at the sea in a different way than he does now. Throughout the whole poem, Arnold uses a metaphor to describe his views and opinions. It seems as though Arnold is questioning his own faith. The whole poem is based on a metaphor sea to faith. When the sea retreats, so does faith, and leaves us with nothing(Miller). Religion provides no relief for his sadness, nor does social or political action(Riede). The only hope left seems to be in personal love.
He is then reminded of his own time and can hear the human misery that surrounds him and his love. The sea is starting to become rougher and agitated. Also the mention of human misery implies that life begins and ends, but it can still be full of happiness, and unfortunately, at the same time, sadness( Allot). The narrator feels like many set other romantics feel: while living in a modern world, they long for the great ages of the past. Like arnold, the speaker feels isolated from the world around him. It seems as if everything great in the past is gone, and the great ages of the future have not yet to come(Rowse). As Arnold shifts to the traditions of religion, he ironically suggests that those who recognize the persistent suffering of humanity must also acknowledge the decline of traditional religious faith. As he contemplates dover beach, Arnold hears the melancholy, long withdrawing roar of the sea of faith. In stanza two, arnold draws an analogy between the once full, but now receding tide and what he calls the sea of faith(Jump).
the point he is trying to portray. In lines 1-6 he is talking about a very peaceful night on the ever so calm sea, with the moonlight shining so intensely on the land. Then he states how the moonlight gleams and is gone because the cliffs of England are standing at their highest peaks, and are blocking the light of the moon. Next, the waves come roaring into the picture, as they draw back and fling the pebbles onto the shore and back out to sea again(Spender 246). Arnold may not be writing a scene of poetic fiction; it seems rather a reflection of the changes he sees in his world due to a rationalism that opposes traditional religious beliefs (Mermin 83). Arnolds intellectual background and culture leads him to recall the Greek drama, sophocles when he compares the aegeans turbid ebb and flow of the sea, to the flow of human misery. As the speaker begins to contemplate t he scene and listens to the pebbles grating with the waves, and an eternal note of sadness emerges (Riede 239). The world changes constantly just like the pebbles that the waves fling continuously. Nature may change and receive no bad effects, but human misery endures.
Dover beach is the mom poignant expression of the desperate need for love which men feel in this world (Miller). As the narrator looks out his window, he sees a beautiful world of nature: the sea and the cliffs under the glow of the moon. Describing this scene to his lover, he invites her to come to the window so that she might see it too. From their lofty vantage point the moonlight reveals an ocean that lies calm, a tide that is full, the distant coast of France, and the cliffs of England(Ball). Arnold describes a night in which the gleam of the moonlight shimmers across the bay. This is a most tranquil night and he is sharing it with the woman he loves. However, the speaker wishes his lover to see more than just what is on the surface. Rather, he wants the speaker to see the beach as an ironic image that is a representation of the world that the he sees (Dickey 235).
The best Place to buy samedayessay can be found Here
Dover beach Essay, research Paper, dover beach, how can life be so wonderful, but at times seem so unbearable? This is a question that Matthew Arnold may have asked himself, while writing dover beach. The poem, one of Arnolds best works, is about a beach that is truly you beautiful, but holds much deeper meaning than what meets the eye. Matthew Arnold presents a very real theme of love and splendor in his poem. He creates a scene of beauty among the sea and shores, mixed with night and moonlight(Harrison). Along with the beauty he also presents us with underlying misery, which is easily over looked and disregarded. Arnold writes really of love and loss and relates it with human misery.